Comparisons

Convex vs Supabase vs Firebase (2026 Comparison)

Comparison5 min readUpdated June 13, 2026

At a glance

Convex, Supabase and Firebase are the three backends most indie hackers and small teams choose between in 2026 to add a database, auth, storage and APIs without standing up servers from scratch. They take different shapes: Convex is a reactive, TypeScript-native backend where your queries are functions and the UI updates in real time by default; Supabase is managed Postgres with auth, storage, edge functions and instant REST APIs, and it is open-source and self-hostable; Firebase is Google's mature, mobile-first platform built on the Firestore NoSQL database with the deepest offline support. The choice usually comes down to your data model (SQL vs document vs reactive), how much you value real-time, and whether you want to be able to self-host. This page compares them honestly so you can match the backend to your app. It pairs with our Modern App Stack Explained article and the Course 3 Convex lesson. Facts are current as of June 2026 and pricing models move over time.

The options

Convex

Reactive, TypeScript-native backend with real-time by default.

Best for: TypeScript apps that want real-time reactivity, end-to-end type safety and the least backend wiring.

Strengths

  • Reactive by default: queries are TypeScript functions and the UI updates live with no extra plumbing.
  • End-to-end type safety from the database to the client, which suits a modern TypeScript stack.
  • Usage-based Pro pricing (about USD 25/mo as of 2026) with no always-on compute baseline.

Trade-offs

  • Source-available under a delayed-open license (FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0), not a classic open-source backend you freely self-host today.
  • A newer, smaller ecosystem than Postgres or Firebase, and a document-style model rather than relational SQL.

Supabase

Open-source Postgres backend with auth, storage and APIs.

Best for: Teams that want a real relational SQL database, the option to self-host and a full open-source backend suite.

Strengths

  • Real PostgreSQL with relational data, Row Level Security, instant REST APIs and a huge SQL ecosystem.
  • Open-source (Apache-2.0) and self-hostable via Docker, so you can avoid lock-in and keep data in-house.
  • A complete suite: database, auth, storage, edge functions and realtime in one platform.

Trade-offs

  • Pro is about USD 25/mo per project but includes always-on compute, so real bills grow with the tier you actually need.
  • More manual wiring than Convex, and free projects pause after a week of inactivity.

Firebase

Google's mature, mobile-first BaaS on Firestore.

Best for: Mobile and offline-first apps that want battle-tested SDKs and Google Cloud integration.

Strengths

  • The most established BaaS, with excellent iOS and Android SDKs and strong offline-first support.
  • A broad ecosystem (auth, messaging, analytics, hosting) and tight Google Cloud integration.
  • A real free tier (Spark) that is fine for prototypes and small apps.

Trade-offs

  • Hosted-only and not self-hostable, with meaningful Google lock-in.
  • Per-read pricing on Firestore can be hard to predict and spike at scale, and the NoSQL model fits relational data poorly.

Side by side

DimensionConvexSupabaseFirebase
Data modelReactive document store (TypeScript functions)Relational SQL (PostgreSQL)NoSQL document store (Firestore)
VendorConvexSupabaseGoogle
LicenseSource-available (FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0)Open-source (Apache-2.0)Closed-source
Self-hostingLimited (source-available, delayed-open)Yes, via DockerNo (hosted-only)
Real-timeReactive by defaultRealtime subscriptions (opt-in)Realtime listeners (opt-in)
Pricing model (as of 2026)Usage-based; Pro about USD 25/mo, no always-on baselineFree tier; Pro about USD 25/mo per project plus computeFree Spark tier; pay-as-you-go, per-read pricing
Best forReal-time TypeScript apps, least wiringSQL apps, self-hosting, open-source suiteMobile and offline-first apps

The verdict

Pick Convex if you are building a TypeScript app and want real-time reactivity and end-to-end type safety with the least backend wiring; it is the most natural fit when live updates are core to the product, with the trade-off of a source-available license and a younger ecosystem. Pick Supabase if you want a real relational SQL database, the freedom to self-host, and a full open-source suite of database, auth, storage and functions; it is the most versatile all-rounder and the safest against lock-in. Pick Firebase if you are shipping a mobile or offline-first app and value its mature SDKs and Google Cloud integration, accepting hosted-only lock-in and per-read pricing that can be hard to predict at scale. The honest rule of thumb: Convex for reactive TypeScript apps, Supabase for SQL and open-source control, Firebase for mobile. For how these fit a full modern stack alongside auth and payments, see our Modern App Stack Explained article, and compare auth providers in our Clerk vs Auth0 vs Supabase Auth page.

Frequently asked questions

Next step

Ready to put AI to work as a real workflow?

Start with the foundations course, keep your progress locally and sync everything to your free account whenever you like.